A Response to Attacks on Archbishop Makarios and on HOCNA
Archbishop Makarios of Athens is an honorable man who knows
the teachings of the Holy Fathers and rightly teaches the word of God's truth.
Matushka Nina, who posted this recent attack piece, does not know the teachings
of the Holy Fathers -- especially on the name of God, the essence and energies
of God, or other theological topics about which she is so zealous to call her
former brethren and loved ones "heretics." Fr. Panagiotes, who wrote
the attack piece, DOES have the capability to read the Scriptures and the Holy
Fathers in the ancient Greek texts, but he teaches the exact opposite of what
those Orthodox texts say.
On the "Awake, Sleeper!" series of articles,
written by Metropolitan Ephraim, about which Fr. Panagiotes became obsessed:
the Holy Apostle Peter says clearly that our Savior preached the Gospel of life
to disobedient souls in Hades. St. Cyril of Alexandria and countless other Holy
Fathers taught explicitly that some of those souls -- especially those who were
not blinded by their former lusts and idolatry -- obtained God's mercy. But Fr.
Panagiotes, in his inexplicable zeal to condemn his former brethren and loved
ones, refuses to accept the teaching of the Orthodox Church on this matter. He
calls the teaching of the Apostles, Fathers, and prayers of the Church on
Christ's destruction of Hades "heresy." In so doing, he has condemned
the Apostle Peter, St. Cyril, and countless saints who taught this Orthodox dogma.
Fr. Panagiotes even went so far as to endorse and distribute a theological
essay that called our Savior's descent into Hades an apocryphal myth! Fr.
Panagiotes has lost any credibility that he may have once had on doctrinal
matters. What he is very good at is slandering the people he once considered
brethren and once loved. Worse, he has condemned the teachings of Christ's
Church. Fr. Panagiotes is no longer a serious man. No one can take him
seriously. Especially on issues of Orthodox dogma, since he knowingly refuses
to accept what the consensus of the Holy Fathers says on the issue of Hades.
Fr. Panagiotes is equally wrong on the issues of the name of
God and the essence and energies of God. The Synodicon of Orthodoxy teaches
that the essence and energies of God are distinct but not separate. Fr.
Panagiotes, in his zeal to call his former brethren "heretics," has
somehow managed to teach two completely opposite heresies: First, the heresy
that the essence and energies are the same; and, Second, that the essence and
energies are separate. The first heresy was taught in a theological paper that
Fr. Panagiotes endorsed that was entitled "What a Name-Glorifyer Is."
The second heresy is found in the writings of Fr. Maximus Marretta in which he
defends the false 1913 Russian statement that separates the essence and
energies of God. The Russians who wrote that mistaken statement (with Sergius
Stragorodsky as main author, but with Archbishop Anthony Khrapovitsky also,
ignorantly, in agreement) can be forgiven because they were ignorant of what
St. Gregory Palamas, the Palamite/Hesychast Synods, and the full Greek text of
the Synodicon of Orthodoxy actually taught on the essence and energies of God.
But Fr, Maximus, Fr. Panagiotes, and the bishops, priests, and monastics of the
Kallinikos faction have access to all those writings in Greek and English -- if
they care to avail themselves of those patristic texts. There is no excuse for
Fr. Panagiotes and his colleagues who hate HOCNA and hate Archbishop Makarios
of Athens to teach heresies about the essence and energies of God simply
because they want theological "weapons" to attack their opponents.
These attackers have zero credibility on Orthodox theology.
In his attacks on the name of God, Fr. Panagiotes
plagiarized an article from Wikipedia. The plagiarized passage -- about
name-glorifiers allegedly using Plato as an authority -- was laughably
inaccurate. But Fr. Panagiotes plagiarized it word for word, with no citation
whatsoever. His dishonesty extends from plagiarizing historically-inaccurate
content from Wikipedia to attacking Orthodox dogma on Christ's destruction of
the power of Hades and Orthodox dogma on the essence and energies of God. Who
can take Fr Panagiotes's dishonest propaganda seriously? Not any critically-thinking
Orthodox Christian who loves the divine dogmas of the Holy Fathers.
Our Savior spoke of the name of God as the glory and power
of Godhood that the Father and the Son share from before the creation of the
world (see St Cyril of Alexandria's commentary on John 17). Fr. Maximus
Marretta has issued "anathemas" against this teaching. Fr. Maximus
Marretta has anathematized our Saviour! Fr. Panagiotes has distributed and
endorsed at least one of Fr. Maximus Marretta's un-Orthodox writings on this
topic. These people, in their zeal to condemn Orthodox Christians, have
anathematized what they find in the Scriptures and Holy Fathers, because they
are consumed with a passion to condemn those whom they once loved in the Faith.
Archbishop Makarios has written very capably about the
uncanonical activities of the Kiouses/Kallinikos faction. If a person actually
cares about what happened among the GOC in Greece, he can read Archbishop
Makarios's book and his other writings on this topic. As far as I have seen,
the Kallinikos faction does not have anyone who is intellectually capable of
writing on Orthodox dogma and canon law in any way comparable to His Beatitude
Archbishop Makarios. That is why writers from the Kallinikos faction have a
well-established pattern of doing things like plagiarizing from Wikipedia,
misquoting and even denying Orthodox dogmas, and, especially, making sleazy
accusations. The Kallinikos people have also used the secular government
authorities -- in both Greece and the United States -- to harass True Orthodox
Christians who do not agree with their uncanonical and un-Christian behavior.
I, personally, commend Archbishop Makarios for cooperating
with new calendarists and other citizens in Greece to oppose new laws on IDs
that many citizens sincerely believed went too far and could be used to deny
the right to full religious freedom for the True Orthodox Christians. The
Archbishop is an educated man who can cooperate with other Greek citizens over
concerns for religious freedom. He deserves our praise for this.
The attacks against His Beatitude are hatchet jobs. They are
uncouth. They deserve to be ignored.
Thomas S. Deretich